Metric name Engagement
Standards area Social media measurement
Metric description and application. The question that this metric answers. Engagement addresses the question of how many individuals were exposed to an item and then took some additional action.

“Engagement is defined as some action beyond exposure and implies an interaction between two or more parties. Social media engagement is an action that typically occurs in response to content an on owned channel – i.e. when some engages with you.” (www.smmstandards.com)

Status This interim standard was developed by the Social Media Measurement Standards Conclave (a cross-industry collaboration bringing together many organizations (see http://www.smmstandards.com/about/). This standard was publicized for comment by the industry, submitted to the Coalition customer panel for review, and then adopted as an interim standard.
Standard or guideline Standard
Metric type Output or Outcome

“Engagement and conversation could be but are not necessarily outcomes. Organizations may weight engagement and conversation types differently based on their goals, but engagement and conversation metrics should be consistent across an organization.”

Detailed description.

This is the actual standard, and must include full description of how to use this metrics

Types of engagement (what counts):

asdfd

  • includes actions such as likes, comments, shares, votes, +1s, links, retweets, video views, content embeds, etc.
  • Engagement types and levels are unique to specific channels but can be aggregated for cross-channel comparison

Engagement is measured by:

  • the total number of interactions within and/or across channels
  • the percentage of your audience engaged by day/week/month
  • and the percentage of engagement for each item of content your organization publishes
Source documents (www.smmstandards.com)
Academic research supporting this standard.
Validity and reliability of the standard. This should reference formal, preferably published, research demonstrating the validity and reliability of the metric, or, in the absence of such research, the kind of research that should be conducted.
Team leads and contact information Katie Paine, IPR Measurement Commission and News Group International

Katie@newsgroupholding.com

Richard Bagnall, AMEC and Metrica

richard@metrica.net

Tim Marklein, Council of Public Relations Firms and W2O Group

tmarklein@wcgworld.com

Version, date, and author Version 1.0

March 19, 2013

PDF: SMM Standards – Engagement

Heidy Modarelli handles Growth & Marketing for IPR. She has previously written for Entrepreneur, TechCrunch, The Next Web, and VentureBeat.
Follow on Twitter

Leave a Reply